by I have heard it before.
“It’s not that I don’t trust my financial Advisor, it’s that I enjoy listening to more than one idea and then decide which idea is the best. So I have three Advisors and split it evenly. I also want to compare performance. It’s not necessary that my other Advisors know what else I own. It’s none of their business. I don’t want to put all my eggs in one basket.
Why this makes no sense.
- 3 or 30 advisors do not necessarily translate into diversification. The advisors or the asset managers for example may all own the same companies. Instead of getting more ideas, they have more of the same.
- With no one Advisor understanding and coordinating the asset allocation management as it pertains to the overall portfolio, greater risk may result.
- Asset allocation management, that is the balance between Stocks, Bonds, Alternative Investments and Cash, is not a static process; rather it is an evolving process that requires:
- Rebalancing when the market movement causes the allocation to become out of balance.
- Reallocating when the client’s situation and family dynamics change.
The rebalancing process is not based on timeframes. Rather it is based on market movement; therefore, having one’s investment assets spread out among several Advisors makes it almost impossible to result in a disciplined rebalancing process.
4. There is the risk of not being able to monitor for appropriate correlation or interrelationship between the investments, funds, and managers. The worst situation is where an individual has a group of Advisors all working with parts of the investment portfolio, and none of the Advisors know what the other Advisors are doing.
Find one Advisor you trust, get agreement on your expectations, and make sure the Advisor is looking at all aspects of your financial life with frequent reviews and adjust accordingly
After all, investors should not be worried about the basket. What good is having multiple baskets, if all the eggs are rotting away.